The elections here in the United States are won and lost by money and
not in the sphere of ideas. This must change so Americans can take
advantage of all ideas even if the candidate touting those ideas is not
well financed. What would happen if candidates were prohibited from
advertising in Print Media, Radio, and Television? Far less money would
be spent on the hype of their campaigns. The internet is a tool that can
deliver all three forms of media at a much smaller cost helping to
level the playing field for a candidate with less name recognition. The
internet has no more barriers than; print media (that you pay for),
Television (You have to buy a piece of electronic equipment), or radio
(again you have to buy a piece of electronic equipment). With computers
you have to only buy a piece of equipment (like a PC or Laptop or use
one at a library normally for free) and then get service which can be
free (wifi) or dialup and DSL service. The internet will help level the
playing field between candidates and we believe America should have the
discussion at drastically reducing the costs for candidates to run for
any elected office. Between yard signs and campaign rallys and the
internet that is really all that is needed to reach everbody in our
modern society.[ Don't think this would pass constitutional muster and does not relate to a states right issue ]
This free website was made using Yola.
No HTML skills required. Build your website in minutes.